Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:45
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Satellite measures river flow waves for the first time - The Washington Post
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Campbell’s Snack Business Struggles as Consumers Get Pickier About Food Spending - WSJ
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Geothermal Energy Has A New, 163-Gigawatt Message For Fossil Fuels - CleanTechnica
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Do you as a gay male enjoy the feeling of getting a penis in your anus?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
China fast tracks rare earth export licences for European companies - Financial Times
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear: